|
Review by: Daniel
Date: 6/16/03
Provided by: OCZ Technology |
OCZ Dominator II-CU and OCZ Ultra II Thermal
Paste Review
Today, we are going to take a look at the OCZ Dominator II-CU Heat
sink along with OCZ's Thermal Paste, the Ultra II. OCZ is well
known for their top-performing memory modules. Let's see if
their heat sink and thermal paste are also top performing.



OCZ's Ultra II Thermal Paste is somewhat like Arctic Silver 3.
Both of them have 99% micronized silver mixed with polysynthetic oil.
We will be comparing the Ultra II with Arctic Silver's newest
compound, Ceramique.

Here is the Dominator II-CU heat sink. When I first took it
out of the box, I thought it looked a lot like the AMD Retail series
of fans, so I decided that comparing this heat sink to an AMD Retail
fan would be perfect. The fan on this particular heat sink was
fairly quiet for a 62mm fan spinning at 5000+ rpm.
Here are the specifications on the heatsink from OCZ's website:
|
-Socket A up to XP 3200+ |
|
-Supports all Socket 370 cpu's |
|
-Single piece construction |
|
-Copper base insert |
|
-Textured fin technology |
|
-Higher fin density |
|
-Overall Dimensions: 62x70x44mm |
|
FAN: |
|
-Stock: 60x10 Whisper Quiet fan |
|
-Speed 5300 rpm |
|
-Ballbearing
fan |
|
-Voltage: 12 volt |
|
-Air
flow: 25 cfm |
|
-Noise: 40 dBA |
|
-Air
pressure: 0.18 inch-H2O |

The Dominator II-CU features what many companies call "micro-fin".
It is basically a heat sink with fins that are dense and more compact,
allowing greater heat dissipation. OCZ states that the fins are
also skived and textured which should allow maximum performance of the
heat sink without a large fan on top of it.

On the bottom of the heat sink, there is a thermal pad. I
suggest you take off the thermal pad and apply thermal paste to the
CPU instead.

You can see that the machine sanding left some grooves on the
bottom of the heatsink.

Taking off the thermal pad is fairly easy, either use a credit card
or a flathead screwdriver to remove the pad.

After removing the thermal pad, I would use sandpaper to get rid of
scratches and some residue from the thermal pad.

Comparing the Dominator II-CU with the ThermalTake Volcano 11+, the
Dominator II-CU appears to be shinier than the Volcano 11+ .
While this may not produce better temperature results, it shows that
OCZ put more work into the bottom part part of the heat sink.

Comparing the tubes of thermal pastes, OCZ seems pretty generous,
giving you a much larger amount of Thermal paste than Arctic Silver.
Here are OCZ's specifications on the Ultra II paste:
|
-Thermal paste 3 gram syringe |
|
-Thermal conductivity: 8.0 W/mK |
|
-Thermal Resistance:>.06 C-in/W |
|
-Made with 99.9% pure micronized silver |
|
-Not electrically conductive |

The Arctic Silver Ceramique is on the left, and the OCZ Ultra II
paste is on the right. Comparing the two compound visually, you
can see that the Ceramique is much smoother in texture. While
the Ultra II is more chunky. I suspect that the compound was
stored in a warehouse too long, because the paste was really hard to
apply to the CPU. The paste kept sticking to the tip of the
syringe.
Installation of the heat sink was fairly easy too, the retention
system was very easy to clip onto the socket. Here is a picture
of the heat sink installed in the socket.

Test Setup:
-AMD Athlon 1100mhz @ 1400mhz (1.775volts)
-ECS K7S5A Motherboard
-512MB DDR PC2100 Mushkin Memory
-nVIDIA GeForce 2 MX 200
-RaidMax Case
-Arctic Silver Ceramique and OCZ Ultra II Thermal
Compounds
I chose
the AMD Athlon 1100mhz and put it at 1400mhz, since the Thunderbird
series of AMD chips get very hot. Since the chip gets very hot,
we can see which heat sink can dissipate the heat better. Either
the AMD Retail heat sink, or the OCZ Dominator II-CU.

Here is
a picture of the AMD retail fan that I will be using.
| |
AMD Retail Fan w/Ceramique |
AMD Retail Fan w/OCZ Ultra II |
|
Idle F |
111 |
114 |
|
Idle C |
43 |
45 |
|
Load F |
123 |
122 |
|
Load C |
50 |
49.5 |
|
OCZ Dominator II-CU w/ Ceramique |
OCZ Dominator II-CU w/OCZ Ultra II |
|
113 |
112 |
|
44.5 |
44 |
|
125 |
125 |
|
51 |
51 |

The
results of the OCZ Dominator II-CU were pretty much even when compared
against the AMD Retail fan. Almost equal in some tests. We
also noticed that the OCZ Ultra II only appeared to work when it was
introduced to higher temperatures. The temperature results of
the Ultra II during idle were higher than the Ceramique. The
results are great for the Dominator II-CU, since the heat sink is much
more compact than the AMD Retail fan. But the AMD Retail fan
does a little bit better, because of its size.
The OCZ Dominator II-CU is great for users who are on a budget and
need a compact heat sink and fan combination that offers moderate
performance at a great price. As for the OCZ Ultra II, it is
very comparable to Arctic Silver 3, and OCZ is more generous in the
amount of paste that they give you.
Techaddicts Computer Reviews would like to give the OCZ Dominator an
8.5 out of 10, and a rating of 8 out of 10 for the Ultra
II Thermal Paste.
Home
©Techaddicts.net Networks, All rights reserved.
|